Home Releases 2022, №3 (61)

FEATURES OF THE PERCEPTION OF DISTANCE LEARNING BY STUDENTS AND UNIVERSITY TEACHERS

Development of a Network of Open Remote Education , UDC: 37.09+378.046 DOI: 10.25688/2072-9014.2022.61.3.05

Authors

  • Mukhametdinova Svetlana Kh. Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor
  • Tyumentseva Evgeniya Yu. Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor
  • Shamis Vitaly A. Candidate of Psychological Sciences, Associate Professor

Annotation

The article is devoted to the analysis of the peculiarities of the perception of distance learning by students and university teachers based on the results of an Internet survey in which 231 respondents from various universities of Omsk and Norilsk took part. In the course of the study, factors were identified that have both negative and positive effects on the effectiveness of the educational process and the socio-psychological state of students in distance learning. The results of the study can be used in the development of effective methods of distance learning in educational systems of universities.

How to link insert

Mukhametdinova, S. K., Tyumentseva, E. Y. & Shamis, V. A. (2022). FEATURES OF THE PERCEPTION OF DISTANCE LEARNING BY STUDENTS AND UNIVERSITY TEACHERS Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2022, №3 (61), 49. https://doi.org/10.25688/2072-9014.2022.61.3.05
References
1. 1. Tchoshanov, M. A. (2021). Learning sciences perspective on engineering of distance learning. Part 2. Higher education in Russia, 30 (3), 43–58. (In Russ.). https://www.doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-3-43-58
2. 2. Moussa, N. M., & El-Khalil, N. S. (2021). Psychological health, competencies and readiness for the transition to distance learning among teachers in the UAE. Psychological Science and Education, 26 (6), 83–95. https://www.doi.org/10.17759/pse.2021260606
3. 3. Keiller, L., Nyoni, C., & Wyk, C. (2020). Online faculty development in lowand middle-income countries for health professions educators: a rapid realist review. Human Resources for Health, 20 (1), article 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-022-00711-6
4. 4. Li, S., Singh, K., Riedel, N., Yu, F., & Jahnke, I. (2022, May). Digital learning experience design and research of a self-paced online course for risk-based inspection of food imports. Food Control, 135, article 108698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108698; https://en.x-mol.com/paper/article/1476040475322916864
5. 5. Burmistrova, N. A., Ivanova, E. V., Meshcheryakova, N. A., & Simonova, N. Y. (2019). Assessment of the quality of subject training of bachelors and masters in changing socio-economic conditions. Standarty i monitoring v obrazovanii. Standards and monitoring in education, 7 (2), 16–24. (in Russ.).
6. 6. Tyumentseva, E. Yu., Abramchenko, N. V., Shamis, V. A., & Mukhametdinova, S. Kh. (2022). Cognitive modeling of the level of perception by university students of distance learning in a pandemic. Science for Education Today, 12 (2), 74–91. (in Russ.). http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2202.04
7. 7. Chernyshov, S. A. (2021). Massive shift of schools towards distance learning in the estimates of a local pedagogical community. Education and science, 23 (3), 131–155. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2021-3-131-155
Download file .pdf 356.04 kb