Home Releases 2023, №2 (64)

PERSONALIZING TASKS FOR STUDENTS BASED ON THEIR PERSONAL PREFERENCES AND INTERESTS AS A MEANS OF INCREASING ENGAGEMENT IN LEARNING ACTIVITIES

Innovative Pedagogical Technologies in Education , UDC: 376.1 DOI: 10.25688/2072-9014.2023.64.2.12

Authors

  • Pobedinskaya Tatiana V.
  • Zaslavskaya Olga Yuryevna Doctor of Pedagogy, Full Professor

Annotation

The article discusses the method of task personalization as an increase in the involvement of primary school students in the educational process using the example of mathematics of the 2nd grade. The educational achievements and the level of involvement in the educational process of the control and experimental groups are compared. Purpose of the study: to study the impact and effectiveness of the method of personalization of tasks based on personal preferences for elementary school students. Research objectives: 1) identify personal preferences and interests of students 2) personalize tasks based on personal preferences and interests of students 3) conduct an experimental study of the effectiveness of the impact of personalized educational content on the level of student engagement. The leading method for solving the first problem was the method of questioning (written survey). The experimental method was used to solve the third problem.

How to link insert

Pobedinskaya, T. V. & Zaslavskaya, O. Y. (2023). PERSONALIZING TASKS FOR STUDENTS BASED ON THEIR PERSONAL PREFERENCES AND INTERESTS AS A MEANS OF INCREASING ENGAGEMENT IN LEARNING ACTIVITIES Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2023, №2 (64), 125. https://doi.org/10.25688/2072-9014.2023.64.2.12
References
1. 1. Boekaerts, M. (2016). Engagement as an inherent aspect of the learning process. Learning and Instruction, 43, 76–83. (In English).
2. 2. Ozcelik, D. A. (1973). Student involvement in the learning process. Hacettepe Bulletin of Social Sciences & Humanities, 5(2), 170–199. (In English).
3. 3. Hu, M., & Li, H. (2017). Student engagement in online learning: a review. International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET), 39–43. (In English).
4. 4. Muravyeva, P. A. (2018). Psychological features of the formation of cognitive interest in younger schoolchildren in the process of educational activity within the framework of a comprehensive school. Humanitarian Studies in the XXI century, 3, 23–28. (In Russ.).
5. 5. Moshkina, N. A., & Shkerina, T. A. (2015). To the question of the development of interest in educational activities among younger schoolchildren. Actual problems of education. History and modernity collection of scientific articles (issue 5, pp. 24–31). Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after V. P. Astafyev. (In Russ.).
6. 6. Okulova, M. L. (2012). The use of information and communication technologies in the development of cognitive activity of students. Distance and Virtual Learning, 3, 117–125. (In Russ.).
7. 7. Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2004). Relationships matter: linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 262–273. (In English).
8. 8. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2012). Motivation and self-regulated learning: theory, research, and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 256–257. (In English).
9. 9. Wolters, C. A., & Taylor, D. J. (2012). A self-regulated learning perspective on student engagement. Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, 635–651 (In English).
10. 10. Cleary, T. J., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2012). A cyclical self-regulatory account of student engagement: theoretical foundations and applications. Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, 237–257. (In English).
11. 11. Wang, M. T., & Holcombe, R. (2010). Adolescents’ perceptions of school environment, engagement, and academic achievement in middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 3, 633–652. (In English).
12. 12. Schliken, T. N. (2015). The project method as one of the conditions for increasing the motivation of students’ learning. Elementary School, 9, 34–38. (In Russ.).
13. 13. Manuzina, E. B. (1998). Individualization of the learning process of younger schoolchildren, taking into account their dominant type of thinking in the context of humanization of education. PhD Dissertation of Pedagogical Sciences. Sochi. 18 p. (In Russ.).
Download file .pdf 512.93 kb