Home Releases 2022, №4 (62)

THE CONCEPT OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF FUNDAMENTAL APPROACHES TO THE INTRODUCTION OF AUGMENTED VIRTUALITY IN THE SYSTEM OF GENERAL EDUCATION

Electronic Means of Support of Education , UDC: 004.93 DOI: 10.25688/2072-9014.2022.62.4.01

Authors

  • Levitzky Mikhail Lvovich Doctor of Pedagogy, Full Professor
  • Zaslavskaya Olga Yuryevna Doctor of Pedagogy, Full Professor

Annotation

Augmented virtuality technology allows you to influence the improvement of the quality of education by activating the episodic visual memory of students. The article considers reasonable methods of teaching the use of such learning technology. The results of the study of the introduction of augmented virtuality in the general education system contain conceptual approaches to the analysis of the consequences and limitations that must be taken into account by the leaders of the educational organization and teachers for the effective use of such technologies. The conclusions of the article can be effectively integrated into everyday pedagogical practice, with the appropriate software and hardware. Purpose: to theoretically substantiate and develop the scientific basis for the use of augmented virtuality technology to improve the effectiveness of education, as well as the development of the content and methods of general education. Objectives: to determine the conceptual foundations that are significant for the implementation of fundamental approaches to the introduction of augmented virtuality in the general education system, the consequences and imitations that must be taken into account when introducing such technologies in educational practice. The article theoretically substantiates the possibility of designing, developing and applying augmented virtuality technology by the example of teaching a school computer science course.

How to link insert

Levitzky, M. L. & Zaslavskaya, O. Y. (2022). THE CONCEPT OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF FUNDAMENTAL APPROACHES TO THE INTRODUCTION OF AUGMENTED VIRTUALITY IN THE SYSTEM OF GENERAL EDUCATION Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2022, №4 (62), 7. https://doi.org/10.25688/2072-9014.2022.62.4.01
References
1. 1. Grinshkun, A. V. (2014). The possibilities of using augmented reality technologies in teaching computer science to schoolchildren. MCU Journal of Informatics and Informatization of Education, 3(29), 87–93. (In Russ.).
2. 2. Zaslavskaya, O. Yu. (2020). Analysis of approaches to the transformation of education in the context of the development of immersive and other digital technologies. MCU Journal of Informatics and Informatization of Education, 3(53), 16–20. (In Russ.).
3. 3. Zaslavskaya, O. Yu. (2016). Interactive learning technologies. Prospects for the development of domestic education: priorities and solutions. Collection of articles of the eighth All-Russian Shamov pedagogical readings of the scientific school of Management of educational systems (pp. 67–71). (In Russ.).
4. 4. Zaslavskaya, O. Yu. (2020). How learning is changing: the transformation of education in the context of the development of digital technologies. Informatization of education and e-learning methodology: digital technologies in education. Proceedings of the IV International Scientific Conference (pp. 426–430). Krasnoyarsk: SFU. (In Russ.).
5. 5. Zaslavskaya, O. Yu. (2020). Transformation of education in the conditions of development of digital technologies. Horizons and risks of education development in the context of systemic changes and digitalization. Collection of scientific papers of the XII International Scientific and Practical Conference (pp. 70–74). Moscow: International Academy of Sciences of Pedagogical Education. (In Russ.).
6. 6. Levitsky, M. L. (2019). The quality of education in the era of global information transformations. Proceedings of the Volgograd State Pedagogical University, 10(143), 4–9. (In Russ.).
7. 7. Levitsky, M. L., Grinshkun, A. V. (2020). Immersive technologies: ways to complement virtuality and the possibility of their use in education. MCU Journal of Informatics and Informatization of Education, 3(53), 21–25. (In Russ.).
8. 8. Sáez-López, J. M., Cózar-Gutierrez, R., González-Calero, J. A., & Gomez Carrasco, C. J. (2020). Augmented Reality in Higher Education: An Evaluation Program in Initial Teacher Training. Educ. Sci, 10(26). (In English).
9. 9. Collins, J., Regenbrecht, H., & Langlotz, T. (2017). Visual coherence in mixed reality: A systematic enquiry. Presence Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 26(1), 16–41. (In English).
10. 10. Frein, L., & Ott, M. (2015). A literature review on immersive virtual reality in education: state of the art and perspectives. Institute for Educational Technology, CNR, Genova, Italy. 125 p. (In English).
11. 11. Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: The teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educ. Technol. Res. dev., 68, 2449–2472. (In English).
12. 12. Boltz, L. O., Yadav, A., Dillman, B., & Robertson, C. (2021). Transitioning to remote learning: Lessons from supporting K-12 teachers through a MOOC. Br. J. Educ. Technol., 52, 1377–1393. (In English).
13. 13. Mystakidis, S. (2021). Motivation Enhancement Methods for Community Building in Extended Reality. In Fisher, J. A. (Ed.). Augmented and Mixed Reality for Communities (pp. 265–282). CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA. (In English).
14. 14. Ziker, C., Truman, B., & Dodds, H. (2021). Cross Reality (XR): Challenges and Opportunities Across the Spectrum. In Innovative Learning Environments in STEM Higher Education: Opportunities, Challenges, and Looking Forward (pp. 55–77). Springer International Publishing: Cham, Swizerland. (In English).
15. 15. Alizadehsalehi, S., Hadavi, A., & Huang, J. C. (2020). From BIM to extended reality in the AEC industry. Autom. Constr, 116, 103254. (In English).
16. 16. Minocha, S., Tudor, A., & Tillings, S. (2017). Affordances of mobile virtual reality and their role in learning and teaching. 31st British Human Computer Interaction Conference, University of Sunderland’s St. Peter’s Campus, UK, 2(18), 79–84. (In English).
17. 17. Maaranen, K., Kynaslahti, H., Byman, R., Sintonen, S., Jyrhämä, R. (2020). Do you mean besides researching and studying? Finnish teacher educators’ views on their professional development. Prof. Dev. Educ., 46, 35–48. (In English).
18. 18. Van der Klink, M., Kools, Q., Avissar, G., White, S., Sakata, T. (2017). Professional development of teacher educators: What do they do? Findings from an explorative international study. Prof. Dev. Educ., 43, 163–178. (In English).
19. 19. Jyrhamä, R., Kynaslahti, H., Krokfors, L., Byman, R., Maranen, K., Toom, A., Kansanen, P. (2008). The appreciation and realization of research-based teacher education: Finnish students’ experiences of teacher education. Eur. J. Teach. Educ., 31, 1–16. (In English).
20. 20. Mystakidis, S., Berki, E. (2014). Participative Design of qMOOCs with Deep Learning and 3d Virtual Immersive Environments: The case of MOOCAGora. In Proceedings of the Can MOOCs Save Europe’s Unemployed Youth? Workshop, ECTEL 2014 Conference, Graz, Austria (p. 345). (In English).
Download file .pdf 2.65 Mb