Home → Releases → 2022, №2 (60) →

DIDACTIC POTENTIAL OF VIRTUAL REALITY AND AUGMENTED VIRTUALITY TECHNOLOGIES

Didactic Aspects of Informatization of Education , UDC: 372.862 DOI: 10.25688/2072-9014.2022.60.2.01

Authors

  • Azevich Aleksey Ivanovich Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor

Annotation

The relevance of the research problem is due to the growing influence of virtual reality and augmented virtuality technologies on many educational processes. New tools are developing rapidly. The traditional process is being replaced by a high-tech environment in which students can immerse themselves in virtual worlds that simulate various processes and phenomena perceived with the help of the senses as if they were happening in real life. In this regard, the purpose of the study is to identify the didactic potential technologies of virtual reality and augmented virtuality, as well as the role of a teacher using these technologies in the context of a broad transformation of education. Research objectives: 1) identify the most important advantages of the described technologies; 2) to substantiate the impact of virtual reality and augmented virtuality technologies on the perception of educational information by students; 3) show the changing role of the teacher in the context of using a high-tech educational environment.
Tags:
Augmented virtuality , Blended learning , Distance learning , Immersive technologies , virtual lesson , Virtual reality

How to link insert

Azevich, A. I. (2022). DIDACTIC POTENTIAL OF VIRTUAL REALITY AND AUGMENTED VIRTUALITY TECHNOLOGIES Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2022, №2 (60), 7. https://doi.org/10.25688/2072-9014.2022.60.2.01
References
1. 1. Azevich, A. I. (2020). Immersive learning technologies: a space of possibilities. In Horizons and risks of education in conditions of systemic changes and transformation. Collection of scientific papers of the XII International Scientific and Practical Conference (pp. 227–230). International Academy of Sciences of Pedagogical Education. Moscow. (In Russ.).
2. 2. Azevich, A. I. (2020). Immersive technologies as a means of visualizing educational information. MCU of Jornal of Informatics and Informatization of Education, 2 (52), 35–43. (In Russ.).
3. 3. Azevich, A. I. (2020). Immersive educational environments: design, construction, use. In Informatization of education and methods of e-learning: digital technologies in education. Materials of the IV International Scientific Conference (in 2 hours; part 2, pp. 357–361). Siberian Federal University. Krasnoyarsk. (In Russ.).
4. 4. Sergeev, S. F. (2009). Educational and professional immersive environments. Moscow: Public education. 432 p. (In Russ.).
5. 5. Azevich, A. I. (2019). Virtual reality as a learning environment. In Modern information technologies in education. Collection of scientific papers of the XXX International Conference (pp. 135–139). Troitsk: FNTO «Baitik». (In Russ.).
6. 6. Azevich, A. I. (2020). Virtual reality as a simulation model. In Mathematical modeling and information technologies in education and science. Collection of materials of the IX International Scientific and Methodological Conference: dedicated to the 75th anniversary of Professor E. Y. Bedaybekov and the 35 school informatics (pp. 166–171). Kazakh National Pedagogical University named after Abai. Almaty, 2020. (In Russ.).
7. 7. Spirina, S. (2014). Virtual reality technologies in education. Moscow: RUK. 98 p. (In Russ.).
8. 8. Selivanov, V. V., & Selivanova, L. N. (2015). The effectiveness of using virtual reality in teaching in youth and adulthood. Continuing education: XXI century, 1 (9), 1–20. (In Russ.).
9. 9. Selivanov, V. V., & Selivanova, L. N. (2014). Virtual reality as a method and means of teaching. Educational technologies and society, 17 (3), 378–391. (In Russ.).
10. 10. Sergeev, S. F. (2010). Virtual simulators: problems of theory and methodology of design. Human-machine systems, 2 (8), 15–20. (In Russ.).
11. 11. Azevich, A. I. (2020). Augmented reality and augmented virtuality as types of immersive technologies. Continuum. Mathematics. Computer science. Education, 2 (18), 79–84. (In Russ.).
12. 12. Pidkasistij P. I. (Ed.) (1998). Pedagogy. Textbook for students of pedagogical universities and pedagogical colleges. Moscow: Pedagogical Society of Russia. 640 p. (In Russ.).
13. 13. Caudell, T. P., & Mizell, D. W. (1992). Augmented reality: an application of headsup display technology to manual manufacturing processes. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, ii (pp. 659–669, vol. 2). Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.
14. 14. Dong, S., Behzadan, A. H., Feng, C., & Kamat, V. R. (2013). Collaborative visualization of engineering processes using tabletop augmented reality. Advances in Engineering Software, 55, 45–55.
15. 15. Henderson, S. J., & Feiner, S. K. (2011). Exploring the Benefits of Augmented Reality Documentation for Maintenance and Repair. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17, 1355–1368.
16. 16. Korea Education & Research Information Service (2005). Research on using augmented reality for interactive educational digital contents. Research Report KR 2005-32.
17. 17. Milgram, P., & Kishino, A. F. (1994). Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems. E77-D (12), 1321–1329.
18. 18. Azuma, R. (1997). A Survey of Augmented. In Reality Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6, 4 (August), 355–385.
19. 19. Radkowski, R. (2015). Investigation of Visual Features for Augmented Reality Assembly Assistance. International Conference on Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality (p. 488–498). Springer.
20. 20. Regenbrecht, H., Baratoff, G., & Wilke, W. (2005). Augmented reality projects in the automotive and aerospace industries. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 25 (6), 48–56.
Download file .pdf 835.33 kb