Authors
- Pobedinskaya Tatiana V.
- Zaslavskaya Olga Yuryevna Doctor of Pedagogy, Full Professor
Annotation
The article discusses the method of personalization of work on the mistakes of students of the main school. The educational achievements of students in the control and experimental groups are compared. The purpose of the study: to study the effectiveness of the method of personalization of work on errors. Research objectives: 1) design a system and implement its prototype for the work of students; 2) develop auxiliary content for personal work on errors; 3) conduct an experimental study of the effectiveness of the impact of personal work on errors on the results of educational activities. The method of experiment was chosen as the leading method for solving the third problem.
How to link insert
Pobedinskaya, T. V. & Zaslavskaya, O. Y. (2023). PERSONALIZATION OF WORK ON THE ERRORS OF STUDENTS OF THE BASIC SCHOOL Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2023, №2 (64), 117. https://doi.org/10.25688/2072-9014.2023.64.2.11
References
1.
1. Roor, L. S. (2015). Work on mistakes as an element of improving the quality of students’ knowledge. Pedagogical Experience: Theory, Methodology, Practice, 1, 3(4), 351–353. (In Russ.).
2.
2. Ruzina, L. A. (2010). The role of error correction lessons in the development of students’ independent activity skills: from the experience of a mathematics teacher. Almanac of Modern Science and Education, 11–1, 113–114. (In Russ.).
3.
3. Sheremetyeva, O. V. (2020). Work on mistakes in math lessons as a condition for organizing productive learning. Artemov Readings. Materials of the XII scientific and practical conference with international participation, Samara, February 20–22, 2020 (pp. 128–131). Samara: Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education. (In Russ.).
4.
4. Kuvaeva, M. A. (2020). Work on the mistakes of students in the process of forming their computing skills. Student – Researcher – Teacher. Materials of the XXI Interuniversity Student Scientific Conference, St. Petersburg, April 01–15, 2019 (pp. 692–696). Saint-Petersburg: A. I. Herzen RSPU. (In Russ.).
5.
5. López, V. A. (2008). Teachers’ attitudes towards correcting students’ written errors and mistakes. Porta Linguarum, 10, 21–30.
6.
6. Cherepinsky, V. (2011). Self-reflective grading: getting students to learn from their mistakes. PRIMUS: Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 21(3), 294–301.
7.
7. Francome, Т. (2018). My math lessons are all about learning from your mistakes: how mixed-attainment mathematics grouping affects the way students experience mathematics. Educational Review, 72(3), 1–20.
8.
8. Iseni, A. (2011). Assessment, testing and correcting students’ errors and mistakes. Language Testing in Asia, 1, 60.
9.
9. Henderson, С., & Harper, K. A. (2009). Quiz corrections: Improving learning by encouraging students to reflect on their mistakes. The Physics Teacher, 47(9), 581–586.
10.
10. Grobe, C. S., & Renkl, А. (2007). Finding and fixing errors in worked examples: can this foster learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 612–634.