Home → Releases → № 1 (71) →

FORMATION OF REGULATORY UNIVERSAL EDUCATIONAL ACTIONS IN THE PROCESS OF LEARNING PROGRAMMING

Pedagogical Informatics , UDC: 373.1.02:372.8 DOI: 10.24412/2072-9014-2025-171-46-60

Authors

  • Gorbunova Anna V.
  • Patarakin Evgeniy Dmitrievich Doctor of Education Sciences, Associate Professor

Annotation

The article explores the relationship between the formation and development of regulatory universal learning actions and solving school programming tasks. It discusses the importance of mastering regulatory actions, including goal setting, planning, evaluation, and control, within the context of modern domestic and international educational standards. To define and refine the theoretical framework of the study, a systematic bibliometric analysis of texts from the digital library of the Association of Computing Machinery related to self-regulation and self-control was conducted. Based on the bibliometric analysis, a fractal matrix table is proposed, founded on vectors of subjectivity and productivity.
Tags:
regulative universal educational activities; programming training; computational thinking; educational standards; pedagogical models; project ta

How to link insert

Gorbunova, A. V. & Patarakin, E. D. (2025). FORMATION OF REGULATORY UNIVERSAL EDUCATIONAL ACTIONS IN THE PROCESS OF LEARNING PROGRAMMING Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", № 1 (71), 46. https://doi.org/10.24412/2072-9014-2025-171-46-60
References
1. 1. Federal State educational standard of primary general education // The register of approximate basic general education programs. URL: https://fgosreestr.ru/uploads/files/14e6445c39109a753ec3b7d239e46fdb.pdf (accessed: 11.23.2024).
2. 2. Asmolov A. Formation of universal educational actions in secondary schools. From action to thought. The task system / A. Asmolov. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 2013. 158 p.
3. 3. Asmolov A. How to design universal learning activities in primary school. From action to thought / A. Asmolov. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 2013. 152 p.
4. 4. Beshenkov S. A. The development of universal educational actions in the general education course of computer science / S. A. Beshenkov, I. I. Trubina, E. V. Mindzayeva. Kemerovo: KRIPKiPRO Publishing House, 2010. 111 p.
5. 5. Federal State educational standard of secondary (full) general education // Techexpert. URL: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/902350579 (accessed: 23.11.2024).
6. 6. Federal State Educational Standard of basic General Education // Garant. URL: https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/401333920 / (accessed: 23.11.2024).
7. 7. Gross M. What the framework means to me: Attitudes of academic librarians toward the ACRL framework for information literacy for higher education / M. Gross, D. Latham, H. Julien. Florida: Library & Information Science Research, 2018. Vol. 40. № 3. P. 262–268.
8. 8. UNESCO. The structure of teachers’ ICT competence. UNESCO recommendations. Version 2.0. UNESCO, Paris, 2011. 115 p.
9. 9. Brooks-Young S. ISTE Standards for Students: A Practical Guide for Learning with Technology / S. Brooks-Young. International Society for Technology in Education, 2017. 48 p.
10. 10. Crompton H. Education Reimagined: Leading Systemwide Change with the ISTE Standards / H. Crompton. La Vergne, TN.: Teaching & Learning Faculty Books. 2018. 42 p.
11. 11. Kozma R. B. Transforming Education: The Power of ICT Policies / R. B. Kozma. UNESCO, 2011. 244 p.
12. 12. Yarmakhov B. B. Basic frameworks of ICT competence in the structure of a teacher’s professional standard / B. B. Yarmakhov, L. A. Sotnikova, E. D. Patarakin // Psychological science and education. 2018. Vol. 23. № 3. P. 67–76.
13. 13. Deci E. L. Large-scale school reform as viewed from the self-determination theory perspective / E. L. Deci // Theory and Research in Education. 2009. Vol. 7. P. 244–252.
14. 14. Ryan R. M. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being / R. M. Ryan, E. L. Deci // American Psychologist. 2000. № 55. P. 68–78.
15. 15. Ryan R. M. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions / R. M. Ryan, E. L. Deci // Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2000. № 25. P. 54–67.
16. 16. Leontiev D. A. Psychology of meaning: the nature, structure and dynamics of semantic reality / D. A. Leontiev. M.: Sense, 2007. 510 p.
17. 17. Leontiev D. A. Self-regulation as a subject of study and as an explanatory principle / D. A. Leontiev. Moscow: Higher School of Economics, 2011. P. 74–89.
18. 18. Leontiev D. A. What gives psychology the concept of a subject: subjectivity as a dimension of personality / D. A. Leontiev. Moscow: Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. 2010. № 3. P. 136–153.
19. 19. Schwartz D. L. The ABCs of How We Learn: 26 Scientifically Proven Approaches, How They Work, and When to Use Them / D. L. Schwartz, J. M. Tsang, K. P. Blair, W. W. Norton & Company, 2016. 412 p.
20. 20. Schwartz D. L. Computers, productive agency, and the effort after shared meaning / D. L. Schwartz, X. Lin // Journal of Computing in Higher Education. 2001. Vol. 12. № 2. P. 3–33.
21. 21. Ackermann E. Piaget’s Constructivism, Papert’s Constructionism: What’s the difference? / E. Ackermann // Future of learning group publication. 2011. Vol. 5, № 3. P. 1–11.
22. 22. Papert S. Situating Constructionism / S. Papert, I. Harel // Constructionism. Ablex Publishing Corporation, 1991. P. 193–206.
23. 23. Malone T. W. What makes things fun to learn? heuristics for designing instructional computer games / T. W. Malone // Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSMALL symposium and the first SIGPC symposium on Small systems. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 1980. P. 162–169.
24. 24. Malone T. W. Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction / T. W. Malone // Cognitive Science. 1981. Vol. 4. P. 333–370.
25. 25. Akour M. Game-based learning approach to improve self-learning motivated students / M. Akour, H. Alsghaier, S. Aldiabat // Int. J. Technol. Enhanc. Learn. 2020. Vol. 12. № 2. P. 146–160.
26. 26. Charosky G. Investigating students’ self-perception of innovation competences in challenge-based and product development courses / G. Charosky, R. Bragos // International Journal of Engineering Education. Tempus Publications, 2021. Vol. 37. № 2. P. 461–470.
27. 27. Clarke-Midura J. Using Informed Design in Informal Computer Science Programs to Increase Youths’ Interest, Self-Efficacy, and Perceptions of Parental Support / J. Clarke-Midura et al. // ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2019. Vol. 19. № 4.
28. 28. Brosens L. Self-Regulating Soft Skills in Group Project-Based Design Education / L. Brosens // Companion of the 2020 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2020. P. 1–5.
29. 29. Peteranetz M. S. Examining the Impact of Computational Creativity Exercises on College Computer Science Students’ Learning, Achievement, Self-Efficacy, and Creativity / M. S. Peteranetz et al. // Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2018. P. 155–160.
30. 30. Paay J. Happy Bits: Interactive Technologies Helping Young Adults with Low Self-Esteem / J. Paay et al. // Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2018. P. 584–596.
31. 31. Gotzsch J. Awaking Your Inner Creative Self / J. Gotzsch // Design Journal. Taylor and Francis Ltd., 2017. Vol. 20. № 1. P. S1072–S1079.
Download file .pdf 1.05 Mb