Authors
- Pozdnukhov Ilya D.
- Safuanov Ildar S. Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Full Professor
Annotation
This article examines the effectiveness of blended learning and examines existing blended learning models that integrate massive open online courses (MOOCs)
into traditional learning environments. Based on the conducted research, the advantages and limitations of MOOC integration were revealed, and a unique practical model of blended learning was developed by integrating MOOCs into the traditional learning environment. Recommendations are given for teachers and lecturers on implementation of the integration of MOOCs into the learning environment.
How to link insert
Pozdnukhov, I. D. & Safuanov, I. S. (2024). INTEGRATION OF MASSIVE OPEN ONLINE COURSES INTO THE EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT: DEVELOPMENT OF A PRACTICAL MODEL OF BLENDED LEARNING Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", № 1 (67), 72. https://doi.org/10.25688/2072-9014.2024.67.1.07
References
1.
1. Garrison D. R. Blended learning: uncovering its transformative potential in higher education / D. R. Garrison, H. Kanuka // The Internet and Higher Education, 2004. № 7 (2). P. 95–105.
2.
2. Gilbert J. A. Development and implementation of a blended teaching course environment / J. A. Gilbert, R. Flores-Zambada // MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching. 2011. № 7 (2). P. 244–260.
3.
3. Morris N. P. How digital technologies, blended learning and MOOCs will impact the future of higher education [Electronic resource] / N. P. Morris // International Conference e-Learning 2014: Multi Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems 2014.
URL: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/157778/ (accessed: 02.09.2023).
4.
4. Distance education [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/cdie20 (accessed: 02.08.2023).
5.
5. Zawacki-Richter O. Mapping research trends from 35 years of publications in distance education / O. Zawacki-Richter, S. Naidu // Distance Education. 2016. № 37 (3). P. 245–269.
6.
6. Online education platforms scale college STEM instruction with equivalent learning outcomes at lower cost / Chirikov I. [et al.] // Science Advances. 2020. № 6 (15). P. 5324.
7.
7. Pozdnukhov I. D. Integration of massive open online courses into the educational process within the framework of secondary general education / I. D. Pozdnukhov, I. S. Safuanov // MCU Journal of Informatics and Informatization of Education. 2023. № 4 (66). P. 34–50.
8.
8. Pobedinskaya T. V. Personalizing tasks for students based on their personal preferences and interests as a means of increasing engagement in learning activities / T. V. Pobedinskaya, O. Yu. Zaslavskaya // MCU Journal of Informatics and Informatization of Education. 2023. № 2 (64). P. 125–132.
9.
9. Postavnichy Yu. S. Technology of mixed learning of schoolchildren in the context of digitalization of education: advantages and disadvantages / Yu. S. Postavnichy // MCU Journal of Informatics and Informatization of Education. 2022. № 3 (61). P. 22–31.
10.
10. Denischeva L. O. Security features personalization of education at the university / L. O. Denischeva, I. S. Safuanov, Yu. A. Semenyachenko, // MCU Journal of Informatics and Informatization of Education. 2022. № 2 (60). P. 72–85.
11.
11. Adopting MOOCs on campus: a collaborative effort to test MOOCs on campuses of the university system of Maryland [Electronic resource] / R. Griffiths [et al.] // Online Learning. 2015. № 19 (2). URL: https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/523 (accessed: 02.09.2023).
12.
12. Israel M. J. Effectiveness of integrating MOOCs in traditional classrooms for undergraduate students / M. J. Israel // International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2015. № 16 (5). P. 102–118.
13.
13. A usability evaluation of a blended MOOC environment: an experimental case study / Yousef A. M. F. [et al.] // International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2015. № 16 (2). P. 69–93.
14.
14. Wrapping a MOOC: student perceptions of an experiment in blended learning / D. Bruff [et al.] // MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching. 2013. № 9. P. 187–199.
15.
15. Firmin R. Case study: using MOOCs for conventional college coursework / R. Firmin // Distance Education. 2014. № 35 (2). P. 178–201.
16.
16. Entwistle N. Conceptions of learning and knowledge in higher education: relationships with study behaviour and influences of learning environments / N. Entwistle, E. R. Peterson // International Journal of Educational Research. 2004. № 41 (6). P. 407–428.
17.
17. Beattie V. I. V. Deep and surface learning: a simple or simplistic dichotomy? / V. I. V. Beattie, B. Collins, B. McInnes // Accounting Education. 1997. № 6 (1). P. 1–12.
18.
18. The relationship between personality, approach to learning and academic performance / A. Duff [et al.] // Personality and Individual Differences. 2004. № 44 (8). P. 1907–1920.
19.
19. Marton F. Approaches to learning / F. Marton, R. Säljö // The Experience of Learnin: Implications for Teaching and Studying in Higher Education. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, Centre for Teaching, Learning and Assessment, 2005. Р. 39–58.
20.
20. Zakharova U. S. MOOCs usage in russian higher educational institutions: why is not there any increasing demand for MOOCs during emergency distance learning? / U. S. Zakharova, K. A. Vilkova, R. N. Abramov // Higher Education in Russia. 2023. Vol. 32, № 2. P. 125–148.
21.
21. Trigwell K. Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning / K. Trigwell, M. Prosser, F. Waterhouse // Higher Education. 1999. № 37 (1). P. 57–70.
22.
22. Akyol Z. Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning / Z. Akyol, D. R. Garrison // British Journal of Educational Technology. 2011. № 42 (2). P. 233–250.