Authors
- Kapterev Andrey Igorevich Doctor of Sociological Sciences, Doctor of pedagogical Sciences, Full Professor
- Romashkova Oxana N. Doctor of Technical Sciences, full professor
- Chiskidov Sergey Vasilievich Candidate of Technical Sciences, docent
Annotation
The development of classification systems or taxonomy of the studied phenomena is one of the main tasks of any science. This is part of the continuing interest in the development of clusters of activities. However, it is likely but no system suitable for all users will ever be developed. Unlike biological species or chemical compounds,
clustering of social activity remains a multifactorial problem. Any taxonomy in pedagogy is based on theories and models shared by the researcher, as well as hypotheses that he verifies. The concept of cluster activity analysis was developed in response to the need to identify patterns in the huge variety of activities available to people. For example, the head of an educational organization (schools, HEI) or an analyst can compare the types of activities used at a particular facility with the allocation of a full range of activities, a generalized list of clusters of activities to identify structural dependence and any gaps. The taxonomy of pedagogical activity based on cluster analysis can be used by educational managers to represent and describe possible social effects and risks. In this regard, the purpose of the study is to identify the possibilities of applying factor and cluster analysis in the digital transformation of education. Research objectives: 1) to analyze the foreign experience of using factor and cluster analysis in socio-humanitarian research; 2) to analyze the domestic experience of using factor and cluster analysis in pedagogical research; 3) to describe the experience of the author’s factor analysis of social risks of reforming the system of general education; 4) to show the prospects and possibilities of using such methods in the digital transformation of education.
How to link insert
Kapterev, A. I., Romashkova, O. N. & Chiskidov, S. V. (2022). EXPERIENCE IN THE APPLICATION OF FACTOR AND CLUSTER ANALYSIS IN THE DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION OF EDUCATION Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2022, №4 (62), 29. https://doi.org/10.25688/2072-9014.2022.62.4.03
References
1.
1. De Grazia, S. (1962). An introductory, near-encyclopedic text for recreation studies. Of Time, Work, and Leisure. New York: Doubleday Anchor.
2.
2. Proctor, C. (1962). Appendix A. In National Recreation Survey, ORRRC Study, report 19. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
3.
3. Bishop, D. (1970). Stability of the Factor Structure of Leisure Behavior. Analysis of Four Communities. Journal of Leisure Research, 2, 160–170.
4.
4. Witt, P. (1971). Factor Structure of Leisure Behavior for High School Age Youth in Three Communities. Journal of Leisure Research, 3(4), 213–219.
5.
5. Burton, T. (1971). Identification of Recreation Types through Cluster Analysis. Society and Leisure, 1, 47–65.
6.
6. Ditton, R., Goodale, T., Johnsen, P. (1975). A Cluster Analysis of Activity, Frequency, and Environmental Variables to Identify Water-Based Recreation Types. Journal of Leisure Research, 7, 282–295.
7.
7. Allen, L., Donnelly, M., Warder, D. (1984). The Stability of Leisure Factor Structures Across Time. Leisure Sciences, 6, 221–238.
8.
8. Becker, B. (1976). Perceived Similarities among Recreational Activities. Journal of Leisure Research, 8, 112–122.
9.
9. Tinsley, H., Johnson, T. (1984). A Preliminary Taxonomy of Leisure Activities. Journal of Leisure Research, 16, 234–244.
10.
10. Chase, D., Cheek, N. (1979). Activity Preferences and Participation: Conclusions from a Factor Analytic Study. Journal of Leisure Research, 11, 92–101.
11.
11. Duncan, D. (1978). Leisure Types: Factor Analyses of Leisure Profiles. Journal of Leisure Research, 10, 113–115.
12.
12. Allen, L., Buchanan T. (1982). Techniques for Comparing Leisure Classification Systems. Journal of Leisure Research, 14, 307–322.
13.
13. Kaplan, M. (1960). Leisure in America: A Social Inquiry. New York: Doubleday.
14.
14. Chubb, M., Chubb, H. (1981). One Third of our Time? New York: Wiley.
15.
15. Fedorov, О. V., & Bolgarov, N. I. (2009). Cluster analysis and risks of innovation activity. Monograph. Moscow: Knorus, 2009. 157 p. (In Russ.).
16.
16. Melikyan, А. V. (2021). Cluster analysis of Russian universities based on the dynamics of their performance indicators. Statistical issues, 28, 5, 58–68. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.34023/2313-6383-2021-28-5-58-68
17.
17. Kapterev, А. I. (1994). Methodological and theoretical foundations of professionalization of library specialists. Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences. Moscow. 44 p. (In Russ.).
18.
18. Vidov, S. V., Kuptsov, М. I., & Tenyaev, V. V. (2017). Cluster analysis of motivation for pedagogical activity of university teachers. Successes of modern science and education, 1, 4, 101–104. (In Russ.).
19.
19. Guschina, O. M., & Ochepovsky, А. V. (2020). Data mining in the study of students’ learning behavior in the e-learning system. Virtual modeling, prototyping and industrial design. Proceedings of the VI International Scientific and Practical Conference, Tambov, October 16–18, 2019 (pp. 257–264). Tambov: Tambov State Technical University. (In Russ.).
20.
20. Romashkova, O. N., Ponomareva, L. A., & Vasilyuk, I. P. (2018). Application of information technologies for the analysis of university rating indicators. Information and telecommunication technologies and mathematical modeling of high-tech systems. Materials of the All-Russian Conference with international participation, Moscow, April 16–20, 2018 (pp. 65–68). Moscow: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. (In Russ.).
21.
21. Romashkova, O. N., Ponomareva, L. A., & Vasilyuk, I. P. (2018). Linear ranking of university performance evaluation. Modern information technologies and IT education, 14, 1, 245–255. (In Russ.).
22.
22. Ermakova, T. N., Romashkova, O. N., & Ponomareva, L. A. (2019). The modernized management structure of the educational system. Bulletin of the Bryansk State Technical University, 6(79), 84–91. (In Russ.).
23.
23. Fedin, F. О., Chiskidov, S. V., & Pavlicheva, Е. N. (2019). Evaluation of the effectiveness of the use of intelligent decision support systems in the technological processes of big data analysis. Information resources of Russia, 6(172), 33–39. (In Russ.).
24.
24. Kapterev, А. I. (2022). Social effects and risks of general education reform. Moscow: Book-expert. 281 p. (In Russ.).
25.
25. Kapterev, A. I. (2021). SHIVA virtual laboratory: School Innovations and Visual Analytics. Certificate of state registration of a computer program. Certificate number: RU 2021665193. Patent Office: Russia. Year of publication: 2021. Application number: 2021664368. Registration date: 14.09.2021. Date of publication: 09.21.2021. (In Russ.).
26.
26. Kapterev, A. I. (2017). System of remote vocational guidance testing of senior schoolchildren «BEGGED». Certificate of state registration of a computer program. Certificate number: 2017617742. Patent Office: Russia. Year of publication: 2017. Application number: 2017614461. Registration date: 16.05.2017. Date of publication: 11.07.2017. (In Russ.).
27.
27. Grinshkun, V. V., & Zaslavsky, A. A. (2020). Domestic and foreign experience in the organization of the educational process based on the construction of individual educational trajectories. MCU Journal of Informatics and Informatization of Education, 1(51), 8–15. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25688/2072-9014.2020.51.1.01