Authors
- Denischeva Larisa Olegovna PhD (Pedagogy), Professor
- Safuanov Ildar S. Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Full Professor
- Semenyachenko Julia Alexandrovna Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor
Annotation
The relevance of the problem of personalization of education in master programs is caused by the fact that when entering the program, students may have different
basic preparation, e.g. the level of knowledge not matching the branch and the stage of study. Teaching experience shows that applicants entering the pedagogical field may not have a basic pedagogical education, but have the education in technical, medical and other fields. The purpose of the study is to describe new approaches based on micromodules to the structuring of one of the teaching methods courses that forms the key competencies of a teacher, using the personalization of learning for masters students with different educational background. Research objectives: 1) to perform an analysis of the development of theories of the personalization of learning in a world science; 2) to study the experience of implementation (or partial implementation) of the personalization of learning in Russian higher educational institutions;
3) to develop models for the implementation of personalized learning in the master’s program in teacher education using the example of various target groups. The main methods for studying this problem have been the study of foreign and domestic literature, the analysis of the experience of Russian universities, and experimental teaching. The article presents a study related to the development of approaches to the personalization of learning for various target groups of masters students based on the development of microcourses (micromodules). It is proposed, using the example of the development of one of the teaching methods courses, to show a scheme for determining the required number of micromodules, to describe various teaching aids and current control of the level of preparation.
How to link insert
Denischeva, L. O., Safuanov, I. S. & Semenyachenko, J. A. (2022). SECURITY FEATURES PERSONALIZATION OF EDUCATION AT THE UNIVERSITY Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2022, №2 (60), 72. https://doi.org/10.25688/2072-9014.2022.60.2.07
References
1.
1. Dewey, J. (2000). Democracy and education (translated from English). Moscow: Pedagogika-Press. 384 p. (In Russ.).
2.
2. Tikhonov, I. I. (Ed.) (1968). Programmed education abroad. Moscow: Higher School. 275 p. (In Russ.).
3.
3. Watters, A. (2021). Teaching machines: the history of personalized learning. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
4.
4. Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13, 6, 4–16. https://doi.org/10.2307/1175554
5.
5. Bloom, B. S. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning. McGraw-Hill.
6.
6. Dwight, A., & Ryan, K. (1969). Microteaching. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
7.
7. Gassler, G., Hug, T., & Glahn, C. (2004). Integrated Micro Learning — an outline of the basic method and first results. Interactive Computer Aided Learning, 4, 1–7.
8.
8. O’Reilly, T. (2007). What is Web 2.0: design patterns and business models for the next generation of software? Communications & Strategies, First Quarter, 1, 17–37.
9.
9. Hug, T., Lindner, M., & Bruck, P. A. (Eds.) (2005). Microlearning: Emerging concepts, practices and technologies after e-learning. Proceedings of microlearning 2005. Learning & working in new media. Innsbruck, Austria: Innsbruck University Press.
10.
10. Hug, T., Lindner, M., & Bruck, P. A. (Eds.) (2006). Micromedia & e-learning 2.0: gaining the big picture. Proceedings of Microlearning Conference 2006. Innsbruck, Austria: Innsbruck University Press.
11.
11. Hug T. (Ed.) (2007). Didactics of microlearning: concepts, discourses and examples. Münster: Waxmann.
12.
12. Hug, T. (2012). Microlearning. In Seel N. M. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (pp. 2268–2271). Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_1583
13.
13. Aldosemani, T. (2019). Microlearning for Macro-outcomes: Students’ Perceptions of Telegram as a Microlearning Tool. In Väljataga, T. & Laanpere, M. (Eds.), Digital Turn in Schools — Research, Policy, Practice, Lecture Notes in Educational Technology (pp. 189–191). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7361-9_13
14.
14. Leong, K., Sung, A., Au, D., & Blanchard, C. (2020). A review of the trend of microlearning. Journal of Work-Applied Management, 13 (1), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1108/jwam-10-2020-0044 10.1108/jwam-10-2020-0044
15.
15. Si, Wei (2017). Application of micro-courses in advanced mathematics teaching in higher vocational colleges. Heilongjiang Science, 19, 141–142.
16.
16. Xu, Jiang (2018). Application of micro-courses in the Teaching of Advanced Mathematics. Journal of Tonghua Normal Uninversity, 39 (12), 115–117.
17.
17. Chen, Chen (2017). Analysis of the strategy of integrating micro-courses into advanced mathematics teaching. Science & Technology Industry Parks, 6, 83.
18.
18. Lu, Fengju (2017). Application of micro-courses in the reform of advanced mathematics teaching. Ming Ying Ke Ji, 7, 213–213.
19.
19. Xue, Qiong, Chen, Aiyun, & Xiao, Xiaofeng (2017). On the application of microcourses in the teaching of advanced mathematics. Ability and Wisdom, 27, 158.
20.
20. Zhou, Ping (2019). Research on the Application of Micro-courses in Advanced mathematics Teaching. Frontiers in Educational Research, 2 (11), 113–118. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2019.021120
21.
21. Orr, D., Pupinis, M., & Kirdulytė, G. (2020). Towards a European approach to micro-credentials: a study of practices and commonalities in offering micro-credentials in European higher education. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/7338
22.
22. Shapiro, Futures H., Nedergaard, Larsen K., & Andersen, T. (2020). A European approach to microcredentials: Background paper for the first meeting of the consultation group on micro-credentials. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/94725
23.
23. OECD (2021). Micro-credential innovations in higher education: Who, What and Why?. OECD Education Policy Perspectives, 39. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/f14ef041-en
24.
24. Berry, B., Airhart, K., & Byrd, P. (2016). Microcredentials: Teacher learning transformed. Phi Delta Kappan, 98, 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721716677260